Sustainable Skiing

Snowmass Ski Area Gets Hydro

Inside this Article

The Pelton wheel used in the Snowmass Ski Area hydro plant
The Pelton wheel used in the Snowmass Ski Area hydro plant was custom-made for the project by Canyon Hydro.
Snowmass Ski Area
Snowmass Ski Area
The microhydroelectric plant on Fanny Hill
The microhydroelectric plant on Fanny Hill now has an educational display that will be viewed by an estimated 750,000 skiers annually.
Water from the turbine exits the tailrace.
Water from the turbine exits the tailrace.
The Pelton wheel used in the Snowmass Ski Area hydro plant
Snowmass Ski Area
The microhydroelectric plant on Fanny Hill
Water from the turbine exits the tailrace.

The histories of Aspen, Colorado, and hydroelectricity converge underground. Silver lodes drew the miners who first established Aspen. And Lester Pelton, the inventor of the modern waterwheel, was a gold miner in California. Both were pursuing a holy grail—vast wealth from the earth’s natural resources.

The silver miners found it in Aspen, once in the form of a 2,200-pound silver nugget. Pelton discovered no gold, but he extracted something more valuable—an efficient way to make clean energy from falling water. One hundred and forty years later, his invention, the Pelton wheel, is being put to use at a ski resort near Aspen, in a revolutionary way.

Sustainable Vision

The silver lodes are long since tapped out, but there is a new grail, of sorts, for the residents of this resort town. It is the idea of a sustainable community, one that can thrive with minimal impact on the environment. In the big picture, the main barrier to that vision is energy use.

As Vijay Vaitheeswaran points out in Power to the People, his superb book on global energy issues,  “The needlessly filthy and inefficient way we use energy is the single most destructive thing we do to the environment.” The average American household is responsible for the annual emission of 23,380 pounds (10,605 kg) of carbon dioxide, the primary greenhouse gas, much of that from electricity use. Now, consider the emissions from plugging in a ski resort. And yet, “With enough clean energy,” Vaitheeswaran notes, “most environmental problems—not just air pollution or global warming, but also chemical waste and recycling and water scarcity—can be tackled.”

The Pelton Wheel

In 1864, when Lester Pelton worked in the mines, mechanical power came from waterwheels spun by jets of water. As the technology evolved, millwrights replaced wooden slats with metal cups, which turned the wheel faster. One day, Pelton observed a broken waterwheel. The jet was hitting the edge of the cup instead of the center. Pelton observed something else—the wheel turned faster than other wheels nearby. Based on his observations, Pelton developed a more efficient design and patented it.

That design became the key component of many modern hydroelectric turbines. A Pelton wheel looks like an industrial flower, or a blacksmith’s rendition of the universe. It is a beautiful and timeless tool, a reminder of human ingenuity that evokes the creativity of a silversmith more than the equations of an engineer. Pelton wheels have brought great affluence to the world through the sale and use of electricity, and great environmental damage through the construction of large dams. But the first wheel that Lester Pelton put to practical use ran his landlady’s sewing machine. Now, that legacy is helping to stitch together the fabric of a sustainable community.

Why Hydro?

Aspen Skiing Company, which operates four ski mountains—Aspen, Snowmass, Highlands, and Buttermilk—and several hotels, is responsible for 28,000 tons (25,401 metric tons) of greenhouse gas pollution every year. Roughly 23,000 tons (20, 865) of that is from electricity use. One of the only ways to address this impact is to buy renewable electricity, which anyone, even homeowners, can purchase from the local utility, Holy Cross Energy.

The city of Aspen buys 67 percent of its electricity as renewables. Aspen Skiing Company buys wind power—about 5 percent of total usage—and increases its purchases annually. But the business can’t afford to buy renewables in the volume necessary to offset impacts, and the practice sometimes confuses guests. The most common question is, “Where’s the windmill?”

Installing a wind turbine on site would be a significant investment. The best sites are far from transmission lines, on the local ridgetops. Areas closer to the transmission infrastructure are more sheltered, so there’s not enough wind. Photovoltaic panels are an option, but they’re expensive, especially for the quantity of energy required. However, one source of renewable energy on ski hills is plentiful, economical, and readily at hand—water.

Early Aspen

Early Aspen was all hydro-powered. In fact, according to The Electric Review from January 1907, “Aspen led the way in the use of electricity for domestic lighting and mining. For years, it was the best-lighted town in the United States. It was the first mining camp to install an electric hoist, and the first to install generators run by water power.”

Today, three substantial micro­hydro systems are still running in the area (and likely many smaller ones). One is on Maroon Creek, and puts out 450 to 500 kilowatts (KW). A 20 KW system is in the basement of the Mountain Chalet in Snowmass. And local microhydro enthusiast Tom Golec has a 40 KW turbine on Ruedi Creek. Unlike dams, microhydro plants take some of the water out of a creek, but don’t have to block the flow. Such systems can generate electricity from relatively small water flows, even seasonal streams—you don’t need to rebuild the Hoover Dam. The water runs through a pipe to a turbine, and then back into the creek downstream.

A Not-So-Costly Installation

The biggest expense of most microhydro systems is the “penstock,” or pipe, that runs from high elevation to low, creating pressurized water that can spin the Pelton wheel. The economics of installing a penstock can often kill a project. At Snowmass Ski Area, installing a basic hydroelectric system would require building a retention pond (at a cost of about US$1 million), and burying 4,000 feet (1,220 m) of 10-inch (25 cm) steel pipe. The cost of such a project is mind-boggling. Once you add up pipe cost and excavation equipment time, you’re pushing a system’s payback into the next millennium. Unless, of course, you have the pipe and pond already in place. At the Snowmass Ski Area in Aspen, we do. We call it a snowmaking system.

Snowmaking pipes run everywhere at some ski resorts. So snowmaking supervisor Jimmy Holton asked, “If we already have half a hydroelectric system, why not just add a turbine and start making electricity?” We determined that a hydro plant could generate renewable energy at a fraction of the cost of using solar-electric panels. And the return on investment could be as low as seven years.

Convinced that a microhydro system was the best way to generate onsite renewable energy, Snowmass Ski Area built a small powerhouse on Fanny Hill, the beginner slope at the base of the mountain. The building houses a 115 KW turbine attached to a 10-inch steel snowmaking pipe that drains water from a storage pond, which is 800 feet (244 m) farther up the mountain and is fed by West Brush Creek. In 2005, our first complete year of operation, we made some 200,000 kilowatt-hours (enough to power 40 homes), while preventing the emission of 400,000 pounds (181,437 kg) of carbon dioxide.

A Turbine On Every Slope

Think about the possibilities. Hundreds of ski resorts in America have snowmaking systems. On our four mountains alone, we have half a dozen more good opportunities for hydro. If we had five or ten turbines running, we’d be generating an enormous amount of renewable energy—enough for say, 200 homes—contributing to clean air, stable climate, and the long-term sustainability of the ski industry and the town. Any ski resort with a snowmaking system should look into installing a turbine.

Inside each of those turbines, you’d find a Pelton wheel, a tool so elegant that it meets Einstein’s design criteria that everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. It’s a device that has its origins tied to the origins of this town, and now, tied to its future as well.


Auden Schendler, Director of Environmental Affairs, Aspen Skiing Co., PO Box 1248, Aspen, CO 81612 • 970-300-7152 • Fax: 970-300-7154 •

Brett Bauer, Canyon Hydro Inc., PO Box 36, Deming, WA 98224 • 360-592-2235 • Fax: 360-592-2235 • • Pelton turbine & generator

Dan Batdorf, Bat Electric, 20200 Charianne Dr., Redding, CA 96002 • 530-221-1336 • Fax: 530-221-3496 • Controls & switchgear

Pat Costello, Costello & Co., 405 Park Ave., Ste. E-6, Basalt, CO 81621 • 970-927-1421 • Fax: 970-927-2008 • Contractor for powerhouse

Robert Gardner, Holy Cross Energy, PO Drawer 2150, Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 • 970-945-5491 • Fax: 970-945-4081 • • Radio-link remote terminal unit (provides generator output & bill info)

Brian Mitchem, Mountain Peak Controls, PO Box 1550, Paonia, CO 81428 • 970-527-2444 • • System automation controls

Mike Hoffman, TPE–Twin Peaks Electric, 145 Cheyenne Ave., Carbondale, CO 81623 • 970-963-1021 • Fax: 970-963-0958 • Electrician

Mark Gressett, Gressett Excavation, 510 Sopris Creek Rd., Basalt, CO 81621 • 970-948-4686 • Excavation

Charles Brugger, Advanced Mechanical Services, PO Box 33237, Denver, CO 80233 • 303-818-5434 • Laser alignment & turbine installation

Tom Golec, Ruedi Creek Water & Power LLC, 15401 Fryingpan Rd., Basalt, CO 81621 • 970-927-4212 • Project consultant

Randy Udall, Community Office for Resource Efficiency (CORE), PO Box 9707, Aspen, CO 81612 • 970-544-9808 • • Project consultant

Comments (0)


You may login with either your assigned username or your e-mail address.
The password field is case sensitive.