For decades, lead-acid battery technology has been the mainstay of battery-based renewable energy systems, providing reliable storage and ample energy capacity. The most common battery used—flooded lead-acid (FLA)—requires regular watering to maintain electrolyte levels and venting to avoid the buildup of hydrogen and sulfuric gases. Additionally, FLAs are large and heavy, making battery replacement a challenging task for some systems.
With all of the recent action in the electric vehicle and personal electronics industries, lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries have gained much attention. Here, we examine Li-ion battery pros and cons, and discover why most system owners won’t be swapping out their FLA batteries anytime soon.
“Lithium-ion” refers to a variety of lithium-based battery chemistries. Each chemistry has its strong and weak points, which means certain types of chemistries are better-suited for particular applications. There continues to be new lithium-based chemistries being developed (such as lithium-air), but it is too early to tell which will become commercially viable. See the “Lithium Battery Technologies” table for details on a few of the more common types of Li-ion chemistries.
Li-ion batteries typically come in one of three formats: pouch, cylindrical, and prismatic (rectangular-cubic). Pouch types tend to be used in small portable devices, such as smart phones and tablet PCs, or in devices where low weight is important, such as hobbyist remote control vehicles. Cylindrical forms lend themselves to powering medium-sized portable devices, such as power tools. Prismatic are generally the largest, and are typically used in electric vehicles. Prismatic types are also favored in applications that were previously powered by lead-acid batteries, such as backup or off-grid telecommunication systems. Prismatic types usually have hard corrugated sides, which creates air gaps between adjacent cells—an aid to cooling.
If Li-ion has an application for residential RE storage, the best candidate is the large-format prismatic lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4; LFP) battery. But how do they compare with lead-acid technologies?
Weight. Comparing weight versus available energy storage, an LFP is about one-third the weight of a lead-acid (LA) battery. This is a great advantage for mobile applications, such as boats/RVs, but for stationary RE applications, weight is usually a consideration only during battery change-out.
Space. At about half the volume of an LA battery with equivalent energy storage, LFPs take up far less space. This may be an advantage for mobile applications, but for stationary RE applications, size or volume is typically not a deciding factor.
Low-Temperature Capacity. The storage capacity of LAs drops by 50% at -4°F, compared to 8% with LFP. Keeping lead-acid batteries warm so that they maintain reasonable capacity in cold climates can be challenging, giving LFPs an advantage. However, LFP batteries generally should be charged at a slower rate when cold—usually no more than a C/10 at ambient temperatures below 32°F. (For example, if you have a 200 Ah battery, a C/10 charge rate will be 20 A.)
Advertisement
Hi John, I looked at the link and saw what appears to be LA paralleled with LFP batteries (I don't know how the capacitors are wired in). In general, mixing battery chemistries is not recommended because the voltage for the various charge stages are hard to match-up between LA and and other chemistries. Fortunately, 6 cells of LA (at 2.2V each) is about the same as 4 cells of LFP (at 3.3V each), so paralleling them may be OK for discharging, but I would still be concerned that during charge, the differing charge characteristics might prevent one or the other of the chemistries from being properly charged. Also, one can expect the LA batteries to reach end of life much sooner than the LFPs, and when they do, the LA batteries will be a drag on the LFPs, reducing the efficiency of the whole setup. If the guy who did this conversion is doing data logging or recoding his experience (e.g. the actual usable watt-hour capacity, how many cycles, etc.), it would be interesting to have the hard data to see how this actually plays out for him. Regards, Randy (author)
A friend of mine in the North Texas Electric Auto Association www.nteaa.org/ made a car which used both LA and LFP. The idea is to use LA as a buffer for the LFP as to balance and charge them. I have moved and so it has been a while since I check on the setup, but it might be something to think and write about. Here are some photos of it: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mbarkl...
Richard, thanks for the question. In the next issue of HP, there will be a companion article about LiIon batteries in EVs. The article will have a table with the specs for the large format LFP batteries. You will see that the rated discharge low temp is -4F, and the rated charge low temp is about 30F. Unless you can keep LFPs above -4F they would not be a good solution for you. In the contiguous 48, even in Minnesota, many EVers find that insulating their battery box, and putting a heater mat under them (powered while plugged in), can keep their batteries warm enough, but at -75F even those measures may not work. Unfortunately, I've not explored battery options for such extreem low temps. You might browse through www.batteryuniversity.com and see about other battery chemistries that might work at those temps. But its likely that you will be trading low temp performance for some other aspect (such as lower power or energy density). Best regards, Randy, Author.
Thanks for weighing in, Randy. Your new article on Li-Ion batteries is now available on the site at https://homepower.com/articles/lith...
Just how cold are LiFePo batteries able to withstand? Here in Tok, AK, we have a problem with even fully charged flooded lead-acid batteries slushing up at -75F or so, and we get that low in most years. Will this kind of cold damage these very expensive items, and what kind of performance (if any) could I expect? FLA are pretty much useless for EV power in winter, but would LFP be viable?